FUE vs DHI complete comparison 2025 - technique differences, clinical indications, when Dr. Arslan chooses each at Hairmedico Istanbul.

What they share

Identical extraction phase: micro-punch device removes individual follicular units from donor area. Neither leaves a linear scar. Both performed under local anaesthetic in a single day. Same recovery timeline. The difference is entirely in the implantation phase.

Fue Vs Dhi Hair Transplant Fue Vs Dhi Which Techni — Hairmedico Istanbul
Hairmedico Istanbul — Hair follicle trichoscopy and donor density analysis

The critical difference

FUE: surgeon creates channels first, then grafts are inserted separately. DHI: Choi Implanter Pen creates channel and places graft simultaneously - no pre-made channels. The pen allows precise control over depth, angle and direction at each individual placement point.

When Dr. Arslan recommends DHI

  • Hairline work requiring maximum angle precision
  • Areas with existing hair to preserve
  • Women - avoids shaving between existing follicles
  • Second procedures adding density
  • Unshaved procedures for smaller sessions

When Dr. Arslan recommends FUE

  • Large sessions 3,500+ grafts
  • Fully bald recipient areas
  • Beard and eyebrow transplants
  • Maximum graft count in single session

Hair Transplant Turkey | Dr. Arslan Musbeh | Pricing

Hair transplant results — natural growth at 12 months
Hairmedico Istanbul — Hair transplant results — natural growth at 12 months
Questions

Common questions

Keep reading

Related articles

Evidence

References & sources

Dr. Arslan Musbeh

Written & medically reviewed by

Dr. Arslan Musbeh

Hair Transplant Surgeon · Founder, Hairmedico
FUE Europe Member · Ministry of Health Accredited · 17+ Years · 3,000+ Personal Cases